QualWeb ACT Implementation
Consistent | Partially consistent | |
---|---|---|
WCAG 2 rules | 20 | 2 |
Proposed rules | 10 | 22 |
Implemented Rules
About QualWeb Results
Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by LASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.
Implementation Details
autocomplete attribute has valid value
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
autocomplete attribute has valid value
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
autocomplete attribute has valid value
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers 22 of the 23 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
autocomplete attribute has valid value | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 9 * | failed |
Inapplicable Example 8 * | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 * | inapplicable |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Button has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Button has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Button has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 17 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Button has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element within body has valid lang attribute
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 19 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Element within body has valid lang attribute | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 * | inapplicable |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers 9 of the 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
Element marked as decorative is not exposed | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Form field has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Form control has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Form field has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 19 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Form control has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 8 * | passed |
Failed Example 8 * | failed |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
HTML page has lang attribute
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
HTML has lang attribute
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has lang attribute
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
HTML has lang attribute | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 1 * | passed |
Failed Example 1 * | failed |
Failed Example 2 * | failed |
Failed Example 3 * | failed |
Failed Example 4 * | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 * | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 * | inapplicable |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Validity of HTML Lang attribute
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Validity of HTML Lang attribute | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
HTML lang and xml:lang match
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 12 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
HTML lang and xml:lang match | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
HTML page has non-empty title
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
HTML Page has a title
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has non-empty title
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
HTML Page has a title | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Image button has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Image button has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Image button has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 12 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Image button has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Image has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Image has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Image has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 18 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Image has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Link has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Link has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Link has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 28 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Link has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | failed |
Failed Example 10 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 11 | passed |
Failed Example 11 | failed |
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
svg element with explicit role has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
svg element with explicit role has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Element with presentational children has no focusable content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers 17 of the 18 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 * | failed |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element with `aria-hidden` has no focusable content
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Element with `aria-hidden` has no focusable content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Line height in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Line height in style attributes is not !important
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Line height in style attributes is not !important
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 21 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Line height in style attributes is not !important | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Meta element has no refresh delay
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Meta-refresh no delay
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Meta element has no refresh delay
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers 13 of the 15 examples.
For 2 examples
no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
test results.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Meta-refresh no delay | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | untested |
Passed Example 2 | untested |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Meta viewport allows for zoom
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
meta viewport does not prevent zoom
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Meta viewport allows for zoom
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
meta viewport does not prevent zoom | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Object element has non-empty accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 18 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Object element has non-empty accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
aria-* attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
aria-* attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
ARIA required context role
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
ARIA required context role
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA required context role
proposed rule.
It covers 14 of the 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
ARIA required context role | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
ARIA required owned elements
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
ARIA required owned elements
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA required owned elements
proposed rule.
It covers 16 of the 17 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
ARIA required owned elements | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
ARIA state or property is permitted
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
ARIA state or property is permitted
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA state or property is permitted
proposed rule.
It covers 15 of the 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
ARIA state or property is permitted | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Passed Example 11 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
ARIA state or property has valid value
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
ARIA state or property has valid value
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
ARIA state or property has valid value
proposed rule.
It covers all 24 examples.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
ARIA state or property has valid value | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | failed |
Failed Example 10 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Audio element content has text alternative
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
audio element content has transcript
, audio element content is media alternative for text
, and Audio element content has text alternative
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Audio element content has text alternative
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 8 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
audio element content has transcript | audio element content is media alternative for text | Audio element content has text alternative | |
---|---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Block of repeated content is collapsible
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Block of repeated content is collapsible
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Block of repeated content is collapsible
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 8 examples.
On 7 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
Block of repeated content is collapsible | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
, Document has heading for non-repeated content
, Block of repeated content is collapsible
, Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
, and Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 14 examples.
On 13 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content | Document has heading for non-repeated content | Block of repeated content is collapsible | Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content | Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 10 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 11 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Passed Example 12 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transforms
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transforms
proposed rule.
It covers 11 of the 12 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Document has heading for non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Document has heading for non-repeated content
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has heading for non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 2 of the 14 examples.
On 12 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
Document has heading for non-repeated content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 12 examples.
On 11 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 2 of the 8 examples.
On 6 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Heading has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Heading has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Heading has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Heading has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Id attribute value is unique
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
`id` attribute value is unique
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Id attribute value is unique
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
`id` attribute value is unique | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
`iframe` elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
proposed rule.
It covers 9 of the 23 examples.
On 14 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
`iframe` elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 10 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
iframe element has accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers 9 of the 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
iframe element has accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Iframe with interactive elements is not excluded from tab-order
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Error message describes invalid form field value
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Error message describes invalid form field value
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Error message describes invalid form field value
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 9 examples.
On 8 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Error message describes invalid form field value | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
proposed rule.
It covers 8 of the 21 examples.
On 13 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Passed Example 11 | passed |
Passed Example 12 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
`meta` element has no refresh delay (no exception)
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
proposed rule.
It covers 11 of the 13 examples.
For 2 examples
no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
test results.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
`meta` element has no refresh delay (no exception) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | untested |
Passed Example 2 | untested |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Role attribute has valid value
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
role attribute has valid value
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Role attribute has valid value
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
role attribute has valid value | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
proposed rule.
It covers 10 of the 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
Element with role attribute has required states and properties | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | passed |
Failed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 7 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Table header cell has assigned cells
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
All table header cells have assigned data cells
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Table header cell has assigned cells
proposed rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
All table header cells have assigned data cells | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Text has minimum contrast
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Text has minimum contrast
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Text has minimum contrast
proposed rule.
It covers 27 of the 32 examples.
On 3 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Text has minimum contrast | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 11 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 10 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable |
Text has enhanced contrast
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Text has enhanced contrast
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Text has enhanced contrast
proposed rule.
It covers 30 of the 34 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
video element visual-only content has description track
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Video element visual-only content has accessible alternative
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 9 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
video element visual-only content has description track | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 5 examples.
On 4 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Visible label is part of accessible name
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Visible label is part of accessible name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Visible label is part of accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 13 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Visible label is part of accessible name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
This rule is implemented by QualWeb using the
Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 14 examples.
On 9 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
Zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |